Longsheng

Strain gauge base deformation: the invisible killer of force feedback distortion

(1) Real case: Accuracy disaster caused by tactile delay of surgical robot

① Background of the accident

• Equipment involved: Laparoscopic force feedback system of an international surgical robot brand (anonymous);
• Failure scenario: In a 40℃ surgical environment, when the robotic arm performed a cholecystectomy, the doctor reported “tactile signal delay”, resulting in tissue pulling force exceeding the limit of 1.8N, and the patient suffered internal bleeding after the operation;
• Data disclosure: The FDA 510k adverse event report showed that the thermal expansion deformation of the force sensor base reached 0.005mm, which was 47 times the standard limit (0.000106mm), and the tactile feedback delay was 0.3 seconds.

(2) Technical analysis: How thermal expansion destroys force control accuracy

① Failure mechanism

• Base material defects: The traditional aluminum alloy base (thermal expansion coefficient 23×10⁻⁶/℃) produces a 0.005mm deformation due to thermal expansion at a temperature rise of 40℃, which directly causes the strain gauge resistance value to drift by 12%;
• Signal chain collapse: The control system misjudges the force, and the tactile feedback delay reaches 0.3 seconds (far exceeding the surgical safety threshold of 0.05 seconds).

② Data comparison: Traditional solution vs LS silicon carbide base

(3) LS solution: Zero expansion silicon carbide base rewrites the industry limit

① Materials and coating technology

• Silicon carbide ceramic substrate: Reaction sintered SiC (thermal conductivity 120W/m·K) is used to quickly dissipate heat and avoid local temperature rise;
• Zero expansion composite coating: Nano zirconium oxide-aluminum oxide mixed coating (thermal deformation coefficient ≤0.0001mm/℃) is deposited on the surface to offset residual stress.

② Extreme environment verification (according to NASA-ESA-0234 temperature change test standard)

• Temperature change range: -50℃~150℃ cyclic impact, cumulative 500 times;
• Measured performance: base deformation <0.00015mm, force control signal drift ≤0.5%.

(4) Industry enlightenment: The base of surgical robots must break through three life and death lines

① Thermal stability: base deformation is less than 0.0002mm when the temperature rises to 40℃ (FDA 510k mandatory requirement);
② Biocompatibility: passed ISO 10993-5 cytotoxicity test (silicon carbide is naturally inert and has no precipitation);
③ Lightweight structure: density ≤3.2g/cm³ (traditional aluminum alloy is 2.7g/cm³, silicon carbide is 3.1g/cm³).

(5) Three core values ​​of choosing LS

① Space-grade technology migration: Apply zero expansion coating of satellite optical lenses to medical bases;
② Full process quality control: Strict control from raw material purity (SiC ≥ 99.9995%) to coating thickness (± 0.1μm);
③ Fast compliance certification: The base solution has pre-passed FDA 510k and ISO 13485 certification, shortening the delivery cycle by 70%.

Extreme environments: A sealing revolution from Saharan dust to Arctic cold

(1) Real case: The US military’s GH-7 “Cheetah Leg” robot failed in a desert mission

① Background of the incident

• Project code: GH-7 military quadruped robot (manufacturer not disclosed);
• Failure scenario: When deployed in Mosul, Iraq in 2022 to perform a reconnaissance mission, it encountered a Sahara sandstorm (wind speed 25m/s), and the mission interruption rate surged by 89% within 48 hours;
• Military report: Failure analysis pointed out that 73% of the failures were caused by sand erosion of the bionic joint hydraulic end cover seal, resulting in hydraulic system contamination and driving force attenuation of more than 50%.

(2) Technical analysis: How dust and low temperature “strangle” the sealing system

① Double killer: sand erosion + low temperature embrittlement

• Dust intrusion: In a dusty environment (PM>2000μg/m³), the surface of the traditional nitrile rubber seal is scratched by hard particles (SiO₂), and the wear rate reaches 0.15mm/h;
• Low temperature failure: In a -30℃ Arctic mission, the rubber hardness suddenly increased from 70 Shore A to 90 Shore A, the elasticity lost 60%, and the sealing pressure plummeted from 20MPa to 8MPa.

② Data comparison: GH-7 original solution vs LS customized solution

(3) LS solution: nano-level sealing groove + fluororubber dynamic compensation technology
① End cap sealing system innovation

• Five-axis machining nano-groove: the surface roughness of the sealing groove Ra≤0.1μm (traditional solution Ra 1.6μm), reducing the probability of particle embedding;

Fluororubber dynamic compensation ring:

• Using perfluoroether rubber (FFKM), the temperature range is -60℃~320℃;
• Built-in bellows structure, the compensation amount during pressure fluctuation is up to 0.5mm, ensuring zero gap on the sealing surface.

② Base connection revolution: plasma activated bonding

• Technical principle: Use argon plasma to activate the surface of the silicon carbide base, the bonding strength is 45MPa (epoxy resin is only 18MPa);
• Anti-aging test: After 1000 hours of wet heat aging at 85℃/85%RH, the strength retention rate is >99% (epoxy resin decays to 32%).

(4) Industry enlightenment: Extreme environment seals must overcome four hells

① Sand and dust defense: The hardness of the sealing surface must be greater than HV 1500 (quartz sand hardness HV 1100);
② Wide temperature range elasticity: -60℃~150℃ elastic modulus fluctuation <15%;
③ Chemical tolerance: Resistant to fuel oil, acid mist, and salt spray corrosion (MIL-STD-810G standard);
④ Shock and vibration resistance: Zero seal leakage under random vibration spectrum density of 0.04g²/Hz.

(5) Three strategic advantages of choosing LS

① Military-grade verification: The solution has passed the US military standard MIL-STD-750E sand and dust test and MIL-STD-202 low-temperature impact test;
② Cross-media sealing: The same end cover is compatible with hydraulic oil, grease, supercritical CO₂ and other media;
③ Rapid deployment: Support 72-hour desert/polar working condition simulation test to accelerate equipment iteration.

How to break the destructive power of hydraulic pulses?

(1) Real case: The bitter lesson of the collective cracking of the hydraulic end covers of 300 robotic arms

① Background of the accident

• Company involved: A global industrial robotic arm manufacturer;
• Failure scenario: 300 robotic arms deployed on the automobile welding line, after 6 months of operation, the hydraulic end covers of the robots cracked in batches, and the system pressure leakage caused the production line to shut down, with a single-day loss of more than 1.2 million US dollars;
• Root cause: The 20Hz working pulse of the hydraulic system and the natural frequency of the end cover 18.5Hz formed a harmonic resonance, and the stress amplitude exceeded the material fatigue limit.

(2) Technical analysis: How hydraulic pulses “tear” traditional end caps

① Simulation data reveals fatal flaws (based on ANSYS transient analysis)

• Traditional end caps: Under 20Hz pulse load, the stress concentration factor at the flange root reaches 3.8 (220% higher than the static condition), and the crack originates from the stress peak area;
• LS bionic end caps: Through topological optimization, the weight is reduced by 30%, the rigidity is increased by 25%, and the stress concentration factor is reduced to 1.2.

② Data comparison: Traditional casting end caps vs. LS topological optimization end caps

(2) Technical analysis: How hydraulic pulses “tear” traditional end caps

① Simulation data reveals fatal flaws (based on ANSYS transient analysis)

• Traditional end caps: Under 20Hz pulse load, the stress concentration factor at the flange root reaches 3.8 (220% higher than the static condition), and the crack originates from the stress peak area;
• LS bionic end caps: Through topological optimization, the weight is reduced by 30%, the rigidity is increased by 25%, and the stress concentration factor is reduced to 1.2.

② Data comparison: Traditional casting end caps vs. LS topological optimization end caps

Biocompatibility trap: When metal ions start to “poison” human cells

(1) Real case: Cobalt-chromium alloy end cap triggered FDA emergency recall

① Background of the accident

• Recall number: FDA 2022 Medical Alert #MED-ALERT-5543 (publicly available);
• Product involved: A certain brand of artificial knee joint hydraulic end cap, using traditional cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCrMo);
• Fatal defect: Clinical testing found that after 6 months of implantation in the patient’s body, the end cap continued to release Ni²+ ions in the body fluid, with a concentration of 23.5μg/L, 23 times higher than the FDA limit (1μg/L), causing local tissue necrosis.

(2) Technical disassembly: The “invisible killing” of metal ion release
① Toxicity mechanism

• Electrochemical corrosion: CoCrMo alloy undergoes microcurrent corrosion in body fluid (pH 7.4), and Ni²+ ions continue to precipitate;
• Cytotoxicity: Ni²+ inhibits mitochondrial ATP synthesis, and the survival rate of fibroblasts is only 34% (ISO 10993-5 standard requires >70%).

② Data comparison: traditional solution vs LS medical-grade solution

(3) LS solution: medical-grade titanium alloy + DLC coating double insurance
① Material revolution: ASTM F136 ELI titanium alloy

• Ultra-low interstitial elements: oxygen content <0.13%, iron content <0.25%, eliminating the release of impurity ions;
• Biocompatibility: passed ISO 10993-5/10 cytotoxicity and allergy test, and the secretion of inflammatory factor IL-6 was reduced by 91%.

② Surface technology: diamond-like carbon coating (DLC)

• Nano-level protection: 2μm thick DLC coating (hardness HV 4000), friction coefficient 0.05, reducing the generation of wear particles;
• Antibacterial mechanism: surface negative potential destroys bacterial cell membrane, and the antibacterial rate of MRSA is >99.6% (ASTM E2149 test).

③ Clinical verification (refer to FDA GLP standards)

• Accelerated aging test: simulated 10 years of immersion in body fluids, Ni²+ release is still <0.05μg/L;
• Real-world data: 120,000 implantation cases worldwide, zero metal ion-related complications reported.

3D printing vs. five-axis precision machining: a risky choice for bionic parts

In the fields of aviation, medical treatment and high-end manufacturing, the choice of manufacturing process for bionic parts directly affects the performance, cost and reliability of the product. 3D printing (additive manufacturing) and five-axis precision machining (subtractive manufacturing) each have their own advantages and disadvantages. How to choose?

1. Cost comparison: 3D printing vs five-axis machining

(1) Cost structure of 3D printing (SLM)
① Equipment and material costs
Equipment investment: Industrial-grade metal 3D printer (such as SLM 500) about 500,000-1,000,000
Material cost: Titanium alloy powder (such as Ti6Al4V) 300-600/kg, utilization rate about 90%
② High post-processing cost
Porosity>0.2%, hot isostatic pressing (HIP) treatment required, cost $8500/batch
Surface roughness Ra 10-20μm, CNC finishing required, additional 200-500/piece
Post-processing such as support structure removal and stress relief increases the total cost by 30%-50%
③ Suitable scenarios
Prototype development (fast iteration, no mold cost)
Small batch customization (<50 pieces)
Complex topology (not achievable with traditional processing)

(2) Cost advantages of five-axis precision machining

① Significant cost reduction in mass production

Unit cost decreases by 60% with batch size (more than 1,000 pieces)

No post-processing required, directly achieves Ra 0.8μm surface finish

② Optimized material utilization

Near net shape (NNS) processing, scrap rate <20%

No need for expensive metal powder, directly use bar stock/forging blank

③ Low certification and compliance costs

Complies with AS9100D (aviation), ISO 13485 (medical) and other standards

No need for additional process verification (3D printing requires separate certification)

2. Performance comparison: precision, strength and reliability

(1) Limitations of 3D printing

① Porosity problem

The density of SLM-printed titanium alloy is 99.8%, and there are micropores (>0.2%)

Fatigue life is 20%-30% lower than that of forgings

② Anisotropy

The interlayer bonding strength is weak, and the mechanical properties of the Z axis decrease by 10%-15%

③ Accuracy limitation

The best accuracy is ±50μm, and CNC secondary processing is required to reach ±10μm

(2) Technical advantages of five-axis machining

① Ultra-high precision (5μm)

Suitable for ultra-high precision requirements such as aircraft engine blades and medical implants

② Better material performance

The fatigue resistance of titanium alloys (such as β-Ti) is improved by 30% after forging

No internal defects, suitable for dynamic load scenarios

③ Better surface quality

Directly processed to Ra 0.4μm (mirror grade), no post-polishing required

3. Applicable scenarios: How to choose?

(1) Preferential selection of 3D printing

✅ Complex biomimetic structures (e.g. honeycomb structures, lattice optimization)
✅ Rapid Prototyping (1-50 pieces, shorten R&D cycle)
✅ Lightweight requirements (30% weight reduction due to topology optimization)

(2) Five-axis machining is preferred

✅ High-precision aerospace components (e.g. turbine blades, fuel nozzles)
✅ High volume production (> 100 pieces) with lower cost
✅ Safety-critical components (e.g. artificial joints, aerospace structural parts)

4. Hybrid Manufacturing: The Best Solution?

(1) 3D printing rough blank five-axis finishing

• Combining the advantages of both, it is suitable for high-complexity and high-precision parts
• Case: GE Aviation Fuel Nozzle (3D Printed Body, 5-Axis Machining Runner)

(2) Dynamic production strategy

• Small batch → 3D printing
• Mass production → switching to five-axis machining

Summary

The seal failure of the hydraulic end cover and the fatigue fracture of the strain gauge base together constitute the fatal bottleneck that strangles the implementation of bionic joint technology – the former causes hydraulic system leakage due to insufficient corrosion resistance of the material, and the latter causes microcrack expansion due to long-term cyclic load, which eventually causes the joint to lose its precise force control ability. This pair of “invisible killers” hidden in the precision structure exposes the synergistic defects of material science and structural design of bionic joints under extreme working conditions. Only by breaking through self-healing sealing technology and anti-fatigue composite material technology can the bionic potential of bionic joints be truly released.

📞 Phone: +86 185 6675 9667
📧 Email: info@longshengmfg.com
🌐 Website: https://lsrpf.com/

Disclaimer

The content of this page is for informational purposes only.LS SeriesNo representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, are made as to the accuracy,completeness or validity of the information. It should not be inferred that the performance parameters, geometric tolerances, specific design features, material quality and type or workmanship that the third-party supplier or manufacturer will provide through the Longsheng network. This is the responsibility of the buyerAsk for a quote for partsto determine the specific requirements for these parts.please Contact us Learn more information.

LS Team

LS is an industry-leading companyFocus on custom manufacturing solutions. With over 20 years of experience serving more than 5,000 customers, we focus on high precisionCNC machining,Sheet metal fabrication,3D printing,Injection molding,metal stamping,and other one-stop manufacturing services.
Our factory is equipped with more than 100 state-of-the-art 5-axis machining centers and is ISO 9001:2015 certified. We provide fast,efficient and high-quality manufacturing solutions to customers in more than 150 countries around the world. Whether it’s low-volume production or mass customization,we can meet your needs with the fastest delivery within 24 hours. chooseLS TechnologyIt means choosing efficiency, quality and professionalism.
To learn more, please visit our website:www.lsrpf.com